A bigger issue than the timing of exit is the question of what sort of trade arrangement the Brexit side actually wants. Some seem to want access to the single market in the manner of Norway and Iceland. Nevertheless, economic area membership (EEA) also means accepting the free movement of people into Britain – which is intensely opposed by many Brexit supporters. Others favor a deal with Europe under the World Trade Organization framework. This is how China and the US currently trade with the EU and it would not require any complex negotiations. This arrangement would enable Britain to do away with EU regulation and close its borders to immigration from Europe. But this would also imply that UK exporters will face the EU’s common external tariff.
Almost all depends on what assumption one makes about how post-Brexit trade deal with Europe would be concluded. "Oxford Economics modeled this scenario and assumed a relative 7 per cent fall in trade volumes over 30 years. The London School of Economics’ Centre for Economic Performance calculates that the long-term costs to Britain of lower trade with the EU could be as high as 9.5 per cent of GDP. Leave campaign-supporting economists have not done much detailed modelling. But one study by Patrick Minford of Cardiff University shows a boost to GDP growth by 2020 on the basis of Britain dismantling all tariffs unilaterally post-Brexit. Under Minford’s assumptions this is great boon to some sectors of the economy which benefit from cheaper imports. But as Minford himself admits, this approach implies catastrophic damage to many exporting firms.”
In this scenario many large companies will prefer to set up shop in the country of interest and manufacture domestically to take advantage of tax incentives and whatever other advantage they can extract from the hosting country for job creation. Of course, this exactly the direction US manufacturing took with respect to China and other countries and exported jobs to countries where labor is cheaper.
No comments:
Post a Comment