TRANSPORTATION NETWORK PROBLEM SOLVING
The Federal Maritime Commission was in the past, the
repository government agency of common carrier rates until the Shipping Act of
1998 stopped the official requirement of filing freight rates. Moreover, the
same Act mandates carriers to publish rates in private networks open to the
public. However, these "open" networks charge a user time-fee for
access to diversified number of rate publishing services, resulting in more confusion to the public
rather than clarity i.e., a manufacturer, exporter, trader, or consultant
needing to quote the landed price of a product would need to subscribe to all
publishing services and spend the time looking for a specific rate!
There are other choices of course and those are: Joining one
of the carriers' conferences for access to their particular logistics network
which makes users captive of a particular conference in addition of not being
able to shop for rates from other conferences or independent carriers.
This business model addresses these issues making our
international world rating system for all modes of transportation a very useful
tool accessible to anyone without being captive to anyone service and at a
reasonable access fee.
This is a highly competitive market and somewhat a monopoly
at the same time. The large capital amount required for entry keeps the
competition in check and national governments have to monitor rate setting
practices to prevent unfair competition, therefore, it is against carrier’s
interest to have rates open to the public for shopping. National legislators require common schedule
carriers to make rates available to the public in order to exploit a given
route. Carriers however get around regulations by publishing rates in private
networks they control in such a way that a user would need to pay for access to
all of the existing networks in order to find a specific rate. Moreover, the
rates are listed at the high end of the spectrum so that carriers can offer
discounts to large brokers, and other third part service providers, while at
the same the same, carriers can enter confidential service agreements with
preferred customers. At the end of the day keeping rates away from shoppers is
the name of the game.
So who needs to participate in such regressive system?
a)
Anybody in the world who needs to ship something
needs to find the best rate for the landed price of a product in order to take
part in international merchandise trade. Mainly, manufacturers, wholesalers,
retailers and merchandise traders in general who have a need for competitive
rates in order to participate in global trade. Whether bulk commodities,
semi-manufactured products and consumer merchandise must have a choice for the
best option in order to enter or stay in a particular international market.
b)
) In this scenario, carriers of goods can
manipulate the market to their advantage, specially, when a country does not
have a merchant marine and must depend on foreign flag carriers that can
co-join routes with other carriers and set prices at will as fewer choices are
globalized. The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund follow these
markets and report to national governments its findings so that better trade
agreements can be negotiated among countries.
This asymmetry of international trade is also monitor by
custom unions as each country has a Customs organization at the ports of entry
or exit of imports and exports. This monitoring tool is as accurate as the
information provided to Customs by the importing or exporting party. The issue
comes down to the difference between free on board (FOB) and cost
insurance-freight (CIF). As a result,
the variation in the cost of imported and exported merchandise at the port of
entry or exit is the cost of transportation. However, declared value or
merchandise for insurance or Customs can vary among individuals shipping the
same or similar merchandise.
By calling freight forwarders, brokers, carriers, and more
recently with the Internet many sites offer freight services but their model is
to obtain shipping information from the user and then go shopping for a carrier
that can provide such service after a fee has been added. Others work on
commission with/or for brokers but this requires licensing from regulators
which is a deterrent for many. In conclusion, obtaining independent freight
rates for a given trade lane is the best option for the existing order where
carriers can make or break a business deal or keep a party from entering the
market.
Curiously enough commodity pricing is not set for the most,
part at the origin, but in financial markets.
Selected samples:
Price Specifications Point
Crude Palm Oil Futures Bursa Malaysian
Peru Fish meal/pellets, 65% protein, CIF United Kingdom
United Kingdom ex-tanker prices, crude extra virgin olive
oil,
Ground nuts 40/50 (40 to 50 count per ounce), in-shell, CIF
Argentina
Rapeseed oil crude, fob Rotterdam
Lamb New Zealand, PL, frozen, wholesale price at Smithfield
Market, London
Coffee, Sugar and Cocoa Exchange, New York Board of Trade.
EU import price, unpacked sugar, CIF European ports.
International Coffee Organization, Other Mild Arabicas New
York cash price.
Cotton Middling 1-3/32 inch staple, Liverpool Index
"A" Cts/lb five of fourteen styles, CIF Liverpool
Singapore Commodity Exchange, No. 3 Rubber Smoked Sheets.
London Metal Exchange, grade A cathodes, spot price, CIF
European ports
London Metal Exchange, standard grade, spot price, minimum
purity 99.5 percent, CIF U.K. ports
China import Iron Ore Fines 62% FE spot CFR Tianjin port;
Malaysian, straits, minimum 99.85 percent purity, Kuala
Lumpur Tin Market
London Metal Exchange, melting grade, spot price, CIF
Northern European ports
London Metal Exchange, high grade 98 percent pure, spot
price, CIF U.K.
London Metal Exchange, 99.97 percent pure, spot price, CIF
European ports.
Metal Bulletin Nuexco Exchange Uranium (U3O8 restricted)
price.
No comments:
Post a Comment